Mikey Makes stupid_free!
Mikey (posting as aktiophi again) decides to lay magickal blame for his mother’s demise at contentlove’s door, in at least three different communities.
This is after similar wagging of his limp, sore-ridden willie over in his own journal, where he hilariously refers to himself as “the most mightiest of magicians“! Clearly his magical attainments haven’t gained him any facility with his native tongue.
You’d think, between being on his deathbed, while doing the Indiana Jones thing through the jungles of Goa (and wasting the potential of a halfway decent camera with some remarkably crappy composition), he wouldn’t find the time to bother with nonsense like this…
Well, maybe you wouldn’t, given about whom we’re talking…
I am not Aktiophi. My camera is better than your Cannon POS. And my pictures are vastly better ccomposed than the boring shit you take which looks like a ’school for the blind’ photo essay contest.
further Gramps : various stock agencies have purchased over 300 of my photographs at 50-150$ each. I am getting paid to have the time of my life in a amazing and wildly beautiful country with over 6,000 years of high culture to explore…fuck you, Gramps.
Sure, you’re not. Aktiophi’s six other guys.
No, it’s not. It’s a comparable camera, with a vastly inferior assortment of lenses available. Doesn’t matter as far as you’re concerned, clearly you’re not in a position to take advantage of anything more sophisticated than an Instamatic.
Sure, they have. With 300 sales, naming a few specific publications I can check shouldn’t be a challenge. Let’s see ‘em.
I didn’t know that Austin had “6,000 years of high culture”. Maybe you’re trying to say that it seems like 6,000 years of culture to you ’cause you’re so high. That might also explain this delusion that your photographs, at least the ones you’ve posted, are something other than amateurish and thoroughly uninspired. Where’ve you been selling ‘em, “Photographic Errors to Avoid Monthly”…?
Oh, hey, have we established that you are got4aco…? Or is that supposed to be somebody else, too, somehow?
Tell you what, Mikey: I’ve offered in the past to prove to you that I’m in, for instance, Japan. Here’s your big chance to make a fool of me: Why don’t you get someone to take a picture of you in front of the Goa Hilton there, or wherever it is that you’re supposed to be camped out, holding today’s newspaper, so you can prove that I’m full of it when I say that you’re full of it, that you aren’t any nearer to India than I am…? I only ask because you’re posting here through another bullshit IP address is all…
I’ve been saying for over a year that he’s a stupid_free just waiting to happen. Guess he just got tired of waiting….
Quit throwing stone is the water. It’s redundant at this point. Rough ride, but worth it. Too, you missed the point. No one gets a free ride.
Enough of the obsessing; you’re wasting away. And you got me, I’m a liar – but I made it.
10-15 years of honest, daily work. Now get at it – or come and get you some. Whatever.
Nope, sorry, wrong state, wrong writing style, Citizen 68.2.140.130.
Well, I suppose that was bound to happen sooner or later too.
Now other lameasses are pretending to be him, instead of the other way around….
You’d have to be pretty damned lame to want to be that…
you dumbass – Pentax k10D fits EVERY PENTAX LENS EVER MADE – ie all the film camera lenses for the last 50 years. Pentax also has gyroscopic anti shake and is weather proofed. The 10 megapixel cannon has no antishake doesn’t even have weather proofing! You are a point and click moron who doesn’t even know HOW to use an SLR or even set an ISO setting. And it shows.
Listen, halfwit, I used a film SLR–and did my own darkroom work. If you happen to have a bunch of “EVERY PENTAX LENS EVER MADE”, and you don’t mind losing any lens-related feature the camera provides, then that might be one thing. If you want to buy a modern telephoto that integrates with the camera, you’re plain out of luck.
A Canon EOS400D isn’t a “point and shoot” camera. ISO ranges from 100 to 1600, with little degradation at higher settings. The sensor on the Canon is superior, the camera is overall faster, and there’s scarcely a feature worth talking about on the Pentax that isn’t on the Canon. The sole advantage I can see to the Pentax might be that you only wanted to deal with SD cards.
Let me remind you that Henri Cartier-Bresson shot his entire career using only a fixed-lens 55mm Leica. Me, I’m perfectly happy with my efforts. I know a decent shot when I see one; trust me, none of yours qualify. There isn’t an interestingly composed picture in the lot. You hiked through the jungle to get a low-contrast, poorly angled picture of 25,000 year old bas reliefs? You’d have been better off doing a rubbing. No, I don’t mean your limp, little willie.
Not that it matters, I don’t think you took ‘em anyway. I’m still waiting for you to prove to me that you’re there. I’d apologize for treating you like a pathological liar, except that you are one.
‘Cause everyone knows that there’s nothing more worth doing in the middle of the afternoon when you’re in India than pounding even more inane comments into the blog of someone you “don’t care” about and whom you’re “never going to read another word” from, using a bogus IP address…
You don’t know a damn thing about photography, your light levels SUCK and you wouldn’t know composition if it bit off a hunk of your yellow, wrinkled mummyface. You also don’t use correct saturation levels. Cannon HAS NO ANTI SHAKE. CANON IS NOT EVEN WEATHER PROOFED. Only amateurs buy Canon. And I have a telephoto lens that can photograph the pores on a face from 300 feet, dipshit. As usual, you talk right out of your aged, know nothing nicotine hole. Poseur at everything, that’s Dave.
Aktiophi, please do something so this psychotic pedophile stops confusing us? Its very annoying.
(and Dave, you don’t have the right to judge an interesting photo as your taste in movies goes no further than Spider Man 3. You are bad taste personified, typified and cast in bronze.)
Talking to yourself, Mikey? And what exactly is it that you expect your sockpuppet is going to do…?
And please, don’t waste my time: no amount of idiot whining on your part is going to make any of those lame photos (supposedly) of yours an iota better. They’re crap, and whoever’s taking them is wasting a perfectly good camera on stuff that might as well have come out of a Brownie.
And plenty of professionals buy Canon, certainly more than buy Pentax. Canon’s two generations ahead of Pentax on their DSLRs…
Tell me, of the photos you’ve posted so far, which do you think is the very best? I’m interested in knowing what your idea of a “good photograph” is, since I don’t see a single one in the lot there…
And an assessment of my taste from someone who thinks that mangy thylacine tattoo you sport is anything more than an embarrassment is not, honestly, going to carry a lot of weight with me. On a similar note, it’s quite entertaining to see just how easily and thoroughly an Abyss-crossin’ fool such as yourself gets his panties in a twist over someone else’s opinion.
Presumably you have better locales for having discussions with yourself than the comments section of my blog. Why don’t you go there instead, hm? You’re just making (more of) a fool of yourself here.
Definiton of a fool : someone who devotes most of their free time to making entire stalker webpages to show their total love and devotion to someone they profess to hate. You are nothing but my #1 Fan.
No one is fooled but you, fool.
(Try to keep than Cannon toy out of a light mist, or you are out 900$, Gramps. and try to imagine what anti shake is like, its exactly like having an invisible tripod) – anti shake is 3 generations ahead of Canon, twat. And its patented, so if Canon wants it, Canon will have to license it)
(oh and proof? check out the “extinct” stuffed animal featured in one of those photos, you unobservant Senility)
First off, don’t flatter yourself: you don’t average ten minutes a week of my time, overall, as should be obvious from my travel schedule and the photos I take en route. Of course, t comes and goes as you swing between mania and depression, but Christmas is coming, it’s all part of your tediously predictable little cycle, flatworm. Somebody needs to keep shining the light on you, and—as you’ve discovered—you’re completing incapable of intimidating me, try as you might, so it might as well be me.
And it’d seem that lots of people are “fooled”: anyone who’s dealt with you and your endless “leaving real soon for Costa Pedophilia” rants views this “I’m in India now! Did I mention I’m in India?” fairy tale with understandable skepticism.
I’ve had the Canon out in drizzle and downpour, in Kyoto, Osaka and Tokyo within the past two weeks, most recently. No problems at all. As far as “anti-shake” goes—and you’ll find you sound like less of a buffoon if you call it “image stabilization”, like most folks do—is of extremely limited utility, unless one is using an absolutely huge lens, or suffers from some sort of neurological disorder. I have yet to come up with a situation where image stabilization would help me much, but if I did, there’s a good range of Canon lenses which provide this. So nobody needs to license anything from anybody.
Of course, this only applies to those of us who aren’t suffering from tabes dorsalis and the attendant palsy… So, in your case, maybe “anti-shake” is more appropriate after all, Shakes.
I saw your beddy-time toy. It doesn’t prove anything except that you, or somebody, sat it next to a puddle. What makes that puddle “India”…? Show me it sitting on tomorrow’s copy of The Goa Times. Better still, let’s see a picture of you holding the paper in front of the Goa Hilton. You’re a proven pathological liar. Why would anyone take your word for anything?
Who would go to India to spend time posting nonsense like this, day after day, 8:30 yesterday night and then again at quarter to two this afternoon…? This in unconvincing. Can’t you find anything better to do in India…? It’s not as though you’ve got anything to say: all you’re doing is demanding, idiotically, that I be jealous of your equipment for some reason. Sorry, I’m just not.
Besides, you know what they say: it’s not what you have, it’s how you use it.
I find it a distinct possibility that those photos could’ve easily been taken anywhere.
Or stolen from anyone.
yeah, thousands upon thousands of people take photos of stuffed thylacines posed in the most obscure deep jungle neolithic rock carving sites… its all the rage!
I dunno: I saw a picture of a stuffed something-or-other next to a puddle. I’m still waiting for some actual evidence that you’re in India.
Seems odd that you’d be posting content-free comments from one of those horrible, difficult-to-find, slow Internet cafes in Goa at ten past midnight, though.
Color me skeptical—and maybe it’s simply that you’re a proven pathological liar—but I think you’re full of shit. I wouldn’t take your word on the sky being up, Mikey…